I think there should be DOSE EXPERIENCE STANDARDS(one standards are established, a post with them should be stickied...). Hell I could even make a script to ask user questions to automate generating their dose experiences.
The standard of posting experience on a dose should be
1) Your level of belief in doses actually work
(because if someone is skeptical and says the dose doesnt work...well not surprised.)
2) Your most successful dose
3) Your least successful dose
4) The level of success of dose A ..(whichever you took)
5) The conditions you took the dose on:
i.e.
(definitely USEFUL. if you are thinking about taking a dose, would you really want to rely on someone who was eating their dinner, chatting on MSN, and on the phone, while taking this dose...)
a) lying down with earbud headphones and eyes closed
b) lying down with over ear type headphones and eyes open ...
c) at the computer with eyes opened, chatting on msn mesesnger and doing some homework while listening.
6) Dose side effects.
(( On a side note to the standards: I would reccomend making subcategories for each dose.rather than people posting the same dose name and their experiences 100 times. ))
Dose Experience Postings should have standards.
-
xsouldeath
- Level 0 (<10)

- Posts: 8
- Joined: Sun Oct 14, 2007 10:54 pm
yeah, it would be more organized, but... you yourself made this thread in DOSE EXPERIENCES, and thread isnt about one...
from what i've seen, people usualy already do give the ratings of how it worked and what not, just not in this proper, neat way... they usualy use description... so what you're just stating the obvious with an extra +
from what i've seen, people usualy already do give the ratings of how it worked and what not, just not in this proper, neat way... they usualy use description... so what you're just stating the obvious with an extra +


