Page 1 of 1
I-Doser's validity
Posted: Mon Mar 21, 2011 4:30 pm
by aj226
Many neuroscientists say that idoser's effects aren't scientifically valid and that it is, in short, a dud. Users of idoser: does it really work for you?
Do you think that it is a relatively safe "digital drug?"
On average, how often do you use it?
Re: I-Doser's validity
Posted: Mon Mar 21, 2011 4:50 pm
by idoser
"Many neuroscientists" ? Right. Where did you get all this research from "many neuroscientists"? Dont make blanket claims if you have nothing to back it up with. And maybe you didnt see the thousands of positive experience reports at I-Doser.com, or reads the loads and loads of posts here from people who have profound experiences with it.
Research:
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17309374
http://pt.wkhealth.com/pt/re/emmednews/ ... -00006.htm
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10460529
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9862906
http://www.actapress.com/Abstract.aspx?paperId=16352
I-Doser Praise:
http://www.asylum.com/2010/07/22/i-dose ... they-work/http://www.lvrj.com/health/i-dosing-can ... 06568.html
Re: I-Doser's validity
Posted: Tue Mar 22, 2011 4:18 am
by arijas
ill agree some doses doesnt work for me just some but i dont think i doser could do something bad.
Re: I-Doser's validity
Posted: Tue Mar 22, 2011 10:38 am
by _Benny_MeXXcaline_
don't worry the only things of bad is that could give you psychological dependence!
Re: I-Doser's validity
Posted: Tue Mar 22, 2011 3:49 pm
by aj226
I made the post out of curiosity in response to this news article:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/co ... 0080204932
...not from a "blanket claim"
Re: I-Doser's validity
Posted: Tue Mar 22, 2011 5:20 pm
by idoser
I remember when they were looking for an interview for that piece - they didnt understand the technology once bit, and im sure didnt fully test.